Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label physicist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label physicist. Show all posts

Day 5 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Scientific Paradigm

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”
Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction
Day 2 - Physics and the Desteni Process – Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia
Day 3 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Third Law of Motion - Equal Force
Day 4 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion

Yesterday, in my blog, I walked an argument, step by step, in common sense, and showed, that the scientific notion, that mass is passively subject to forces around it, indicates that there is a higher power, a law of nature, a god, an external force that is directing existence - but immediately I disregarded it because it doesn't coincide with my belief system as I have never believed there is a god, so how can I allow myself to prove it's existence?
 
I realize that what I have done is in alignment with how science has always allowed itself to be, as scientists could only ever prove that which is in alignment with their belief system, instead of looking at the facts as the physical evidence and not influence the experiment with ideas and beliefs . Thomas Kuhn, described this phenomena in "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", he explains that we have always existed within a dominant Paradigm, an agreed and accepted model of reality, accepted through being proven by experiments, but it's not just that we are confined to the realm of knowledge that we have been able to discover through valid experimentation, Kuhn explains that the Paradigm itself, as the model we use to view reality by, has been based and constructed on preconceptions which embody hidden assumptions and elements which cannot be directly seen. And thus he shows that science has always been confined to the limitation of the accepted preconceptions, yet had been presented through the experiments it held, making it seem valid as the ultimate truth, more than it actually ever was, not revealing the hidden assumptions that the whole pile of cards was standing on.
 
It was fascinating because I saw myself do it as I was doing it. I actually surprised myself with the common sense line of reason I was going by but then I allowed myself to react to the conclusion I ended up with - I allowed myself to follow my reaction, as I allowed the force of the reaction to direct me, as I allowed myself to be subject to external forces instead of remaining here, as directive principle, stable within awareness and simply continue to follow the equation in common sense.
 
 
The following part is extracted from my previous blog, I have highlighted the points I recognize as the points of reaction, as well as the points of self conflict as I'm not in alignment with myself because I was writing out of fear, trying to hide what I had just found and only show what I wanted to show to begin with, in a way I mock my own findings instead of allowing myself to investigate them purely, as a true scientist:
 
“The idea that mass is a passive object creates a paradox that can be solved either through the acceptance of a god almighty or some other external mystery force that is the sole director of this reality, or by accepting the idea that the mass is it's own directive principle and that everything in reality is self responsible…”
here I don’t allow myself to see that the two points can, and do, exist simultaneously, and don’t contradict each other as I initially feared, as I clearly show later in the post, we are in fact subject to external forces, so there is no point in denying it, nor placing value or judgment over it – it simply is what is here.
 
“As far as I see it there are three options, 1) there is a god that is directing everything, and making us do the scientific experiments that we do, and is in fact the directive principle and the sole responsible for all that is here - I see this as a great way to bale out of taking responsibility”
here again I am trapped in the notion that the option that there is a god must be debunked and thus i do not see that the to conclusions that did not have a simplistic common sense argument against them, must be equally investigated and might be equally valid, as they seam to be now, when looking at it with fresh eyes. but see here how instead of giving a valid argument i mock the idea, and continue on as if it was valid.
 
“or 3) everything has awareness, equally, but we have all abdicated our responsibility of ourselves and of reality as existence as a whole, thus we must self realize, we must find ourselves within ourselves within the physical as the physical - this is in essence the desteni process, a process of self empowerment so that we can be more than who we have accepted ourselves to be as enslaved to mysterious forces that are directing us”
here I can’t escape the point that I so wanted to disregard, though I am not aware that I’m using the argument that i was trying to push away.
 
“but rather investigate ourselves within the starting point of self honesty and realize that we are ourselves, and thus can realize ourselves as who we are, what we do, why we do it, so that within realizing this, we can become self aware and equalize ourselves to the forces that are as of yet exerted at us, and direct them as our own force, then all in existence can do the same equally, because we are all connected within the interactions that we exist in.”
here I am again, using the fact that there are forces exerted at us at the base of my argument, yet not allowing myself to admit it…
 
 
I am grateful this had happened, and I ask you to read this series of blogs using critical reasoning, question what I am saying, investigate for yourself, take responsibility for the information you are reading, not only here, but everywhere, and realize that I am learning this with you as i am walking this, so if you have any questions or clarifications, please write me a comment so that i can further investigate the point and clear it for both you and myself.
 
 
I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to allow my belief system to interfere and direct me instead of walking the common sense step by step and within self trust allowing myself to come to a conclusion that isn't based or tainted by my preconceptions but is a result of the step by step process of common sense that I have walked.
 
I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to react to the conclusion I came to as "there must be a higher power directing us" instead of allowing myself to remain stable and continue my investigation and trust myself within common sense that whatever I find is valid to be investigated and looked at, and not to be overlooked and brushed away out of fear.
 
I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to fear that the conclusions I come to won't coincide with the point I am trying to make, that I will find a contradiction between the laws of physics and the desteni message, which up to now have proven to be aligned and thus I fear them not being, within this I forgive myself for not accepting and allowing myself to trust myself that I will be able to overcome any contradiction through common sense within realizing the actual law that govern reality as equality and oneness, which is the solution to be realized in order to bring about a reality that is best for all, thus I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to doubt the basic law of reality as equality and oneness and within allowing myself to doubt within fear, I have allowed myself to alter the conclusions and thus compromising the research, instead of realizing that if equality and oneness is actually the law of reality, there would be no contradictions, and thus with further investigation I will find a way to walk the point step by step in common sense, thus I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to be directed by fear, fear which would be the cause for me to not find the specific steps but instead to jump over and skip, as the mind does, and thus to harm/compromise the research I am holding, thus I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to be directed by my fears, not realizing the consequences of such actions as not having a valid research and thus compromising myself and the group of humanity as a whole.
 
I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to hold on to the desteni massage as a belief, instead of letting go the belief within self trust that whatever is here - is here, and thus if I find a contradiction instead of going into fear I go into further investigation to through investigating within self honesty to trust myself that what I find is valid, within realizing that if a point is walked in specificity and common sense without reaction as holding on to beliefs, within self honesty and consideration of that which is here as the physical reality - it will always be aligned with the forces of nature as what is here, aligned with the law of reality and thus, within self trust, within consistent and uncompromising investigation, I am sure to find what is here, what has always been here, as the truth of reality
 
I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to allow my beliefs to influence myself and direct me, to then, within the reaction to the conclusion that I had come to, try and manipulate the information to say what I initially wanted to say, and thus have participated in presenting bias information as not presenting the simple facts within common sense step by step, but have allowed myself to alter the conclusions to fit my belief system within the self interest of not wanting my belief system to be compromised within not wanting myself to change within allowing the force of inertia, the resistance to change, to be greater and more powerful than me, instead of remaining here, within and as breath, as the directive principle of/as myself within self trust, and walk within/as breath, step by step.
 
I pause for a moment and investigate this statement "equality and oneness is the law that govern reality" - I investigate it to make sure I am not falling right back into a form of belief, but can prove this to myself within common sense, step by step - this law is actually very simplistic, what it means is that the cause will always be equal to the effect, the starting point will always be equal to the outflow, and the one cannot exist without the other, thus they are one, the same as any point of polarity that can only exist with the other side of the polarity existing equally, thus they both co-exist as one, and for balance to maintain they must be equal - and this is all is going on in this one reality, this one universe that we all share and co-exist, there is nothing in the universe that can be taken out of the equation in separation.
 
I commit myself to slow myself down within this investigation, and to not allow myself to alter the conclusions to fit my belief system, within this I commit myself to investigate the points until I am satisfied that all steps are aligned in common sense, as I realize that skipping steps and jumping to conclusions is a property of the mind, as the mind doesn't walk in a breath by breath movement, skipping steps is not aligned with physical forces as the forces of nature, as reality, within realizing that the physical, as the force of nature, as god, as the law that dictate all that is here, does not skip steps but follows the law of nature which is itself, and thus within common sense I realize that I can brake anything down and show all the steps of common sense in the equation and not be dependent on the mind and my belief system because I know all the answers and all the steps are here and thus can be exposed and discovered, if only I don't alter and manipulate the physical evidence to suit me in self interest.
 
I commit myself to if I see myself reacting to a point that I have reached through common sense, to investigate what am I holding on to, what set of beliefs I am not willing to let go, I commit myself to investigate the definition I have given god for example, in order to expand myself and allow myself to define whatever it is in alignment with what is here as the principle of equality and oneness, thus redefine if necessary in order to remain aligned with what is here as the physical, and the basic laws of nature.

 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Day 3 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Third Law of Motion - Equal Force

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”
Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction
Day 2 - Physics and the Desteni Process – Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia
 
Newton's AppleIn my previous blog I discussed Newton's first law of motion, also known as the principle of inertia, showing how all things resist change, within this we've seen that the property that determine how much resistance an object will have is their "inertial mass" as the mass of the object, within the Desteni Process of self change, the "inertial mass" that will resist our self change is energy, as in how much energy / attention we give to our mind components as patterns / thoughts / beliefs, how much we are emotionally invested in our self beliefs and self definitions, how much value we give an idea / opinion - where the more "inertial mass", the more energy a pattern has, the more resistance it will have towards change. Newton's first law of motions tells us that without a force acting upon an object, the object will simply continue as it was - the same goes for us, without any force "pushing" us to change - we will not change, we will remain in our comfort zone, where the more energy, as "inertial mass", we have invested in a point/pattern/thought/idea, the more uncomfortable it will feel to move out of it.
 
In this blog I will discuss the concept of force
 
In physics, a Force is any influence that causes an object to undergo a certain change, it is done within the context of interactions, whenever objects interact they exert forces upon each other, thus an interaction is a relationship between forces. Our reality works within relationships, everything that we can see, describe or experience is created through relationships, and each relationship is connected by the forces involved within the interaction.
 
For a moment I will skip over Newton's second law of motions and start with the third law because there is an interesting point within it that has been overlooked, I'll clear this point up now, and then in future blogs will be able to reference back to it if necessary.
 
Newton's third law is a law of interaction and equality, it is presented as such:
fab=fba
Where:
FAB = the force object A is exerting on object B
FBA = the force object B is exerting on object A
 
What this simple equation means is that within the interaction of any two object, the force exerted by object A upon object B, is equal and opposite in direction (hence the minus sign in the equation) to the force that object B is simultaneously exerting on object A. the law is described as follows:
 

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
 
What this means is, for example, when you are pushing against a wall, the wall is actually pushing you back in an equal force and in an opposite direction, and it makes sense because if there was nothing pushing you back, you would fall through the wall. When you are sitting on an uncomfortable chair, and feel like the chair is pushing you on a specific point, you are actually pushing that point against the chair.
 
We experience force being exerted upon us within a point of blame and self victimization, as if we are forced by the force, when actually, within looking at it self honestly, it really only shows us that we are exerting force onto it, this is a law that allows us to see our acceptances and participations, because, have a look, if I am in an uncomfortable position, where I am not enjoying the interaction, that would mean that I am participating and exerting force that is a key ingredient in the creation and stability of the uncomfortable situation as only through my participation within this equal and opposite force, can the other force which I blame, exist - thus my uncomfortablility from a perceptive of taking self responsibility is actually only due to my participation within the interaction, and not the responsibility of anything or anyone else in the equation.
 
What I find odd and unacceptable about the definition of this law is within the words "action" and "reaction", because it implies cause and effect, while in fact the two forces are being exerted simultaneously, thus it's only a matter of perception and interpretation to come to the conclusion that the one force is causing the activation of the other - the common accepted belief derived from the specific wording of Newton's third law definition is that the one is initially pushing the wall and only as a reaction the wall is pushing back - but in actuality it cannot be so, because it is happening simultaneously, there would be no physical and valid reason to assume that the one force is the "action" and the other is the "reaction" and not the other way around, yet the use of words within the definition indicates inequality, which is in complete contradiction to the basic equation, that actually implies equality. So, from my perspective, the greatness of this law has been overlooked and wrongly interpreted.
 
Despite this insight within FAB = - FBA which implies equality within each and every interaction, it has been agreed upon in the physics community that all calculations are done in respect to the forces acting on the body, and not in respect to the equal and opposite forces that the body is participating in - mathematically this wouldn't change a thing, it is merely a reflection of the point of view that the physics community is representing, as the scientific community is as well trapped in their own minds, not seeing the forces that are in play, not realizing the forces they are participating with and supporting, as the mind system, through their wrongly interpretations. It might seem like a random decision to some, but really it isn't random at all, it is very specific, because we can clearly see that it goes in alignment with the mind consciousness system, where as the mind we exist within blame, we believe things are happening to us, because we have never considered taking responsibility and realizing that we are the source of all our experiences, and here physics is another layer of justification as it has been aligned with the mind's perspective, as looking at an object and analyzing what is happening to it, while not considering looking at the same exact forces that the object is emitting back and thus is responsible for, equally.
 
So here, science, within the interpretation of physics, has given us the wrong example, as it has been agreed upon in the scientific community that the forces in discussion are the ones being emitted upon a body and not the forces the body is emitting and thus responsible for - this perspective reflects us as victims to circumstances, instead of realizing the self empowerment within taking responsibility for ourselves within realizing that we are participating and thus are the source of all our interactions, and within this realization learn/investigate ourselves, to recognize how/why we have allowed ourselves to be directed by forces, why we have accepted ourselves as less than them, and direct ourselves to change, within a starting point of equality to and as ourselves, to and as the force within us, to and as reality and the physical as a whole of which we are one with and equal to, and within doing so, take responsibility and direct our force to support ourselves as life and all life as one - all this has been hidden from us, through the "random" interpretation of Newton's third law of motion.
 
Unfortunately, the implications of this law, within the current understanding is one of abdicating self responsibility instead of realizing the self empowerment that exists within this law, within realizing that we are actively participating within every interaction and relationship, yet we believe ourselves to be less than, within the belief that things are being done to us, and are being forced upon us, not realizing that we are allowing every force that is being placed upon us through our acceptance and allowance within and as the interaction, as Newton's third law states for every force exerted onto us we are exerting an equal force, and thus are equal participants in the interaction. Which is actually great news because it means that we can takes self responsibility and direct ourselves within our participation, and thus direct our force to support ourselves as life, and not be directed by the force of the mind - This means we are powerful, we have always had the force within us, as us, within every interaction, but we have never before learnt how to use it, we have not realized ourselves as equal to it - we must realize that all that we need is to change our starting point of how we allow ourselves to exist as, from a starting point of inferiority within believing the things are being done to us, to a starting point of equality within realizing that all that is here is interacting through equal and mutual relationships, and thus we are responsible for our participation, and thus we can direct ourselves and our force within us in support of ourselves as life.
 
We must realize that within every interaction there is an acceptance of both participants in the interaction and thus both are equally responsible and are exerting equal force towards one another, thus, our ability to direct ourselves and the force within us, and thus the interactions we participate within, our ability to make a directive decision whether or not to participate in an interaction, or to direct it in awareness as a practical solution - are interesting points to consider - it can be seen nicely in Kong Fu (I've seen this in movies) where the Kong Fu master won't participate in the exchange of forces, he won't fight back, but rather "use the opponent's force against him" what he is actually doing is simply not participating in the exchange of forces the opponent was attempting to direct, but rather is directing the situation, one can say he is creating a new equation as a practical solution instead of participating within and enhancing the problem, he is directing a new result of the situation. From this perspective we must realize our responsibility of our interaction and forces around us and thus recognize our participation with our own forces, because in each interaction we can either be directed by the force as less than the force, as being forced to do something by a perceived external force, or we can change our starting point within it all and realize ourselves as equal to the force within us, that we have been participating in without being aware, and thus, within changing our starting point, change ourselves as a point of responsibility and support of life.
 
We are all directed by the forces exerted at us, the forces within us direct us as thoughts, feeling and motions that we follow blindly within existing as less than, we are directed by the system of the world as money as we are forced to work for our living, we are forced by our physical form and limited in our motions and abilities - many forces are exerted at us - through the support of Desteni Process, what we must do is to equalize ourselves to and as these forces, because, the third law of motions shows us that for each force exerted upon us, we are exerting an equal and opposite force, so we must now take responsibility for our force which we have been denying as ourselves, we must realize that we are in fact actively participating with everything in existence yet we are not the directive principle, as we are allowing ourselves to follow thoughts, feelings, emotions which are energy, that in itself is derived from the physical, thus we are allowing ourselves to exist as less than the thoughts which are directing us, less the emotions and feelings that are directing us, less than energy and less than the physical as a whole - as long as we exist as less, we are still participating but without directive principle, so we are forced by the force, we are thus not self responsible as we haven't taken on a point of responsibility as equals, we must empower ourselves and learn to direct the force within us that we are actually participating within already, and so use our force in support of life, and so take responsibility that all force will be directed as support of life
 
Once we realize this point, and within walking the desteni process, we start taking responsibility and our range of responsibility grows, we first take responsibility for ourselves within making sure that our participation is of support of ourselves as life, within the principle of do as you would like to receive, then we can start considering those around us within realizing that even though they are responsible for all the forces they participate in, they are yet to be aware of it, or in other cases, they are restricted to a situation where they have to participate in a specific way based on fear of survival due to the situation of this abusive system in which we exist within, because at the moment the system in which we exist within, which we created and continue creating through our participation, is driven by the forces of the mind, and as such is not aligned with supporting all as life, thus, as long as we exist in such a system the forces around us are many and the task to take responsibility is greater due to having more obstacles on the way, thus if we are in a position that allows us to hear this message, and to act on it, to take self responsibility, to direct ourselves within self honesty as what is best for all - if we have the ability to do so, then we have a responsibility to support others to do so as well.
 
Within this it's important for me to emphasize that this isn't in no way about blaming those that are in bad situations through justifying it within the principle that they are participating and responsible for everything in their experience, because consider that I have made this point very simplified as looking at the most simplistic case of interaction between two objects alone, when in fact all and every thing in this reality interact with everything simultaneously, thus in every moment you are interacting with every other particle in existence and thus are equally responsible for the condition of our existence and every being within it, because you are exerting force that allows the stability of this existence to exist and within it the stability of the current system that doesn’t support all life- so one must be self honest and not go into a point of isolation within the idea that everyone is responsible solely for themselves - no, we are all equally responsible for everything, but we start with self and then expand, so each of us, in time, and as process unfolds, will have to take responsibility for all those that are not yet in a position to take responsibility for themselves due to the system we exist within. We must realize that the system is the way it is due to each of our acceptance and our accumulated force put into holding it together, and thus we must direct our force to be in the best interest of all life.
 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life
Enhanced by Zemanta

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Share This