Physics Journey to Life

In the following blogs I will be going back to basics, thus I will be walking a step by step process, through the textbook "Fundamentals of Physics Extended", 8th Edition, by David Halliday, Robert Resnick and Jearl Walker, and through the investigation of this book I will open up points as they come up in regards to how we can utilize the world of physics to derive common sense perspective that can, within application, support humanity to align ourselves with the law of physics, as we have been existing in separation from it and only using it to our benefit within manipulating the physical through our acquired knowledge and research, instead of co-existing with the physical, learning from it and projecting what we see in the physical onto ourselves to find inner insight as to how we can perfect ourselves as the physical within the law of physics works as perfection, as wholeness, as unity.


Chapter 1.1 - STANDARDS OF LENGTH, MASS, AND TIME
 
The three basic quantities in Mechanics are length [L], mass [M], and time [T], while all other quantities in mechanics can be expressed in terms of these three. For instance, as has been shown in previous blogs, velocity is defined by how much length a body moves in a period of time, thus it would be expressed by length divided to time, thus [L]/[T], volume is three dimensions of length as height times width times depths, thus will be expressed by [L]^3, acceleration is the change in velocity through time and thus will be expressed as velocity divided by time which will give us [L]/[T]^2, and force as we've seen is mass times acceleration F=ma, thus force will be expressed as [M][L]/[T]^2.


Though, as we know all these quantities can be expressed in different units, length can be referring to a meter, a centimeter, a mile etc. mass can be described as a pound, a kilo, a gram etc. and time can be a second, a month, a year etc. Due to all the different options to express the same quantity, we can clearly see that a standard unit must be defined for effective communication within the scientific community and humanity as a whole - to be able to build a bridge over a river we must be able to communicate effectively as to how wide the river is, we must thus speak the same "language" of units, for this reason the scientific community was wise to create and define an international standardized system known as the SI System units, which defined the units of length (meters), mass (kilograms), and time (seconds), and other units for temperature, electric current and more.


It's important to emphasize that the units chosen are completely arbitrary from the perspective that they don't have any actual physical value nor any actual physical meaning - a meter is merely the distance between two lines on a specific platinum–iridium bar, it is a length chosen randomly, it was accepted historically and "stuck", same as with time - the duration of the day was divided to 24 hour periods and then every hour was divided to 60 minutes and every minute to 60 seconds, and this was convenient due to the era and how the measurements were done and it was accepted, though it could have been any other division of the day and the laws of physics would not have been interfered.


This next text is for you to be amused as I was when I read how some of these units came about, here is a glimpse of how arbitrary they are:

Copied from the textbook (pg. 4) - "In A.D. 1120 the king of England decreed that the standard of length in his country would be named the yard and would be precisely equal to the distance from the tip of his nose to the end of his outstretched arm. Similarly, the original standard for the foot adopted by the French was the length of the royal foot of King Louis XIV. This standard prevailed until 1799, when the legal standard of length in France became the meter, defined as one ten-millionth the distance from the equator to the North Pole along one particular longitudinal line that passes through Paris."
 

The practicality of having an international system for units is clear, yet it's interesting to see that to this day some countries and organizations are still not willing to let go their historical choice of units and to join the rest of the world in unison - there are some units that have proven to be more practical than others, for instance the metric / decimal system is very convenient for length as it goes in the power of 10, so mathematically and intuitively it's easy to deal with this unit and transition from different scales within it as from millimeters to kilometers and so on, you just multiply or divide by a power of 10 - despite the simplicity of the metric system, still today you will find the mile system being used even though it is much more complicated as there are 1760 yards in a mile, and 3 feet in a yard - the only reason this awkward system is still being used is based in ego, separation and money as those that insist to keep on using this system, as America for instance, are doing so from self interest reasons, not considering what would be best for the scientific, engineering and other professional communities and humanity as a whole, as they want to maintain their individuality within "respecting" their heritage or for other political and economical reasons, even though it doesn't make any sense and is actually dangerous as there have been many documented occasions over the years of mistakes happening due to the different unit systems, some fetal and some amusing, due to the confusion in unit conversions or a simple disregard to which unit is being used at the moment - some of these mistake are presented in this document.


Here is a chance for us, as humanity, to learn from this example and take in some supportive features as well as learn from the compromising aspects of this point - within creating the standardized units we are given both an example of applying a common sense principle that is best for all as having one standardized system of units for the entire world, as we all communicate and share information constantly and continually, and thus, having one system has many benefits as well as preventing misunderstanding as the link above clearly show exist, and thus acts within the principle of prevention is the best cure - on the other hand, we are simultaneously shown the nature of the human, as the human exist within self interest to keep an individualized self definition, as a unit system in this case, as the desire to hold on to ones individuality is greater than the practical common sense of all agreeing on one system that will benefit all and will through having one system prevent dangerous mishaps.


Now, just to be clear, it's not to say that the SI unit is the most effective and practical system that can be, though the decimal system has proven itself to be very effective and easy to use, it's the principle of having one system for all, just as the common sense in having one language for all as English is the accepted scientific language, and thus scientist can communicate and share findings through this common language. Once all agree on a system, the system can be adjusted and improved to perfection, and thus form the one most effective system that all work with.


The principle of having a standardized system will have an economic and ecological effect as all equipment for any industry will be geared to one system, so we will not need to produce the same equipment in different unit scales, as well as all the accessory equipment to go with it. Standardizing allows us to put our efforts in perfecting the chosen standard and improving it as new research and data allow us - this type of common sense is suggested in the equal money system, as having the best and highest standard for everything we need, thus for instance, we will have only one best cell phone charger that will be suitable for all phones, this will allow the highest standard taking into consideration all knowledge in the field, and will eliminate all the extra production we are now creating with many different chargers, as each phone uses a different charger and when you change your phone, all the accessories have to change with it because nothing is yet to be standardized. Another example is electricity, there isn't an international standard in electricity so in every country you have to have converters to use your electronic shaver, or laptop, and thus you need to purchase more "accessories" to you equipment, and thus more needs to be produced, and thus more energy is wasted and more pollution is being created - all because we have not standardized.


But as long as we are working with many systems, we will have all equipment in all different units, thus we now see that standardization has an economical effect and thus economic interests are pulling the strings, and not the interest of humanity as a whole, as many people have a profit based interest to keep the different standards alive, because it requires more factories, and thus more jobs and more money flow - this might sound like a good thing, but this is actually a good thing only to those that benefit from the capitalistic system, and it is seen as good only through the narrow sighted mind of capitalism, thus, I suggest investigate the equal money system, as there is explicit and detailed information as how we can create a system that actually support us within being aligned with all that is here, and thus creating a system that is aligned with the law of the physical, as one with the physical as all life that is here, which should be the goal of the science of physics, as this is the only way we can walk with the forces of nature and not against them - as we can be sure that if at war with nature - nature will eventually win, if not the temporary battle, than certainly the war. Thus, we must align ourselves, use all the insight physics is providing us, use the brightest brains according to the system, and apply them to create an entire system that in all aspect supports us as humanity through aligning ourselves to support and walk with all that is here.


Having said that, another point to look at and consider is that, as I've said, the individual quantities and their units have no value in the physical, what does have value is the relationships and interactions between them. Humanity, and scientists as representatives and main influencers on our belief system, have been emphasizing the quantity as what has value instead of looking at and investigating further the relationships and interactions - they have considered these three quantities as mass, length and time to be stable and constant and have gone to great measures to standardize them, but then came along Einstein's special theory of relativity, which I will expand on in later blogs, but in short, what Einstein had found is that all these quantities are relative from perspective that their value changes according to the velocity they are moving in, and according to the frame of reference they are being looked at from, and thus he demonstrated that even mass, length and time are relative, and thus exist within a relationship to their velocity, which means that their property as their value is aligned and defined according to their relationship and interaction with the rest of existence and are not in fact standing stable and independent as initially they have been considered to be.


Yet, the general perspective hasn't changed all that much in over 100 years since relativity and it's implications were discovered - we as humanity, thanks to the paradigm that we exist within, thanks to the scientists that have become like gods in the modern world and their word and perspective of reality has been valued to such an extent due to their influence on our economy and life in all arenas, still view the world within a starting point of individual quantities while disregarding the interconnectedness, relationships and interactions between all these quantities that we so thrive to measure, compare and perfect.


As long as we hold onto the starting point of defining a quantity by it's value, and thus looking for the value of a quantity and disregard it's relationship and interaction with everything else in existence we are disregarding the essence of the world in which we live in, we are ignoring the actuality of reality as everything is in fact in a constant interaction and cannot be isolated and defined as an individualized quantity - this is clearly seen in the education system, as we educate children to compete and achieve good grades as the value given to their studies, but there is no emphasis in teaching them to relate with their environment, there is no attempt to teach them about real intimate communication with each other, the whole education system, as a reflection of our society, is directing our children towards competition, as isolated individual with a value defining them, not through their ability to interact and thus not educating them to interact, but through standardized test, a quantity, a grade, a number - ignoring who they are as life, and looking only at the standard.


To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”

Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction

Day 2 - Physics and the Desteni Process – Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia

Day 3 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Third Law of Motion - Equal Force

Day 4 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Newton's Second Law of Motion

Day 5 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Scientific Paradigm

I have been discussing forces in the past few blogs, and I realized that I haven't yet defined what is force sufficiently. a force is some form of an influence, as impact within the interaction of two or more masses that causes any form of change to take place - though a force can be emitted without any apparent change taking place and that would mean that the force wasn't effective, maybe not strong enough to over come inertia or other forces in play, or was not pushing in the "right" direction - Newton's definition of force is that which causes a mass to create a specific change as acceleration - this definition relates to another concept in physics - "work", where a force is said to be doing "work" when it results in the movement of the mass in the direction of the force, in a way, work is defined through the "success" of the force to "do it's job" as to influence the mass within movement (I will expand more on work in a separate blog to come) - so what is force?
 
As I see it, regardless the outcome of the interaction, in any interaction, in any point of contact, in any form of communication - exists force. I've been trying to look at it from the perspective of cause and effect, but due to all masses being subject to forces, and all forces being subject to other external forces, I found myself lost in infinity - as I was investigating the point I came to realize that the force is both the cause and the effect, the starting point and the consequence, of every interaction and every relationship, which is actually everything - because everything exists within relationships and interactions - any interaction would be caused by a force, and will result in a force, so reality is swirling from a force to an interaction, to a force to an interaction into infinity.
 
To make what I'm saying more clear, imagine a time-line shaped like a spring as the image, now imagine that every loop in the spring is isolated, so it would now look like we have many isolated rings - this is what we do in physics as we define a "closed system", as if it is in a way separated from the rest of existence, and investigate it as an isolated system, as an isolated ring, we isolate the experiment to any external forces, or take into consideration some external forces such as gravity and include it to the system, but we do this within the assumption that systems can be isolated - this is another hidden assumption made by the scientific community, that I for one have never really questioned before, but if you look at it, it cannot be taken for granted that systems can be isolated, because everything in existence is inter-connected, so any attempt to isolate a system is already distancing itself from the actuality of that which is here, as all in existence interact with everything else, thus nothing can really be isolated.
 
In each isolated ring the scientists can cause a force as a cause and then investigate it's effect on the isolated/closed system and masses within it. But when we re-connect the rings to return to their initial form of a spring we will see what I have stated above – Have a look, you can start with placing a force at any point on the spring, the force through interaction will effect the mass into acceleration, or will influence it in some form, and as the result of the interaction, at the end of the loop, we will have another force, that then begins a new loop, and so on and so forth.
 
To explain the point further let's go back to Newton's second law of motion F=ma – I will give an example, within this example I will define the mass, the force and the acceleration specifically. Which brings up another point to consider, in which physics had defined mass as basically passive and a very simplistic and constant property, here I will open up further the definition of mass within considering more properties it might have.
 
Lets have a look at mass media, as a form of interaction that comes from one source and reaches the masses (have you ever noticed that many people are called masses? An interesting use of words) - the media is exerting force onto us as it influences us through our interaction with it, lets' investigate the equation - the mass would be the information, the acceleration is the application of this information by the media as new articles or any platform the media uses to move its' mass, and thus accelerate the information, in turn it creates a force as we are influenced by it to believe certain things, to go out and protest, to feel in a certain way, and you can consider the accumulated amount of force the media is exerting in order to influence so many points of mass, as the masses - through our interaction with the media we are forced, not by our directive principle, to move, we don't know why or how the force of the media influenced us, yet we are influenced, and then as we take our interpretation of the information, and make it into another point of mass, and accelerate it through our application - if we read something that we interpret as offensive we will write a comment to the editor, or if we saw a sale on a product we like, we will buy it on the next run to the mall, or even initiate an un planed run to the mall - we were influenced by the force created by our interaction with the media, to create a mass of our own as interpretation which now hold an energetic experience to it that we didn't ask for, thus we didn't direct it as ourselves - we were forced into it, and we act on it as we accelerate it within our application and give it motion, thus, through this we create a force as the outflow of our actions, as the influence our actions will have on reality.
 
In this example I walked through two connected rings - the media as a force exerted on the masses, influences the masses through acceleration it's own mass as information, and then as a result, we create a point of mass as our interpretation and reaction to the forces exerted upon us by the media, and accelerate the mass through our actions which creates another point of interaction and thus force and so on - in order to investigate the entire spring and not just look at the isolated rings, we must investigate what are the forces that were exerted on the media to set it's mass into action, and then go back to the forces that were exerted on those forces and so on…
 
Information is one property of mass, another property would be for instance memories, as we accumulate memories as mass and then as we apply these memories into action we create a force. A simple every day example exists in all our relationships, as we hold on to memories of scenarios that happened in the past within our relationship to another, we put the memory into acceleration when we tap into it and direct ourselves according to it – if i have a memory of my boyfriend cheating on me, every time i will tap into that memory i will feel betrayed and act on my feelings, thus accelerate the memory through my application.
 
Through the spring analogy it's actually interesting to see that as we live our lives accumulating memories and putting them into action as acceleration, the force we are exerting will be equal to the starting point - and thus we create the same experiences over and over and thus accumulate more of the same memories to justify to ourselves that we were right to believe and hold on to that memory as saying to ourselves "here, it happened again", not realizing that through holding on to the memory as the mass of ourselves, we accelerate the memories through applying them, participating with them, and believing them to be valid and true, and thus we create a force that is equal to them, and thus repeat the experience over and over.
 
An interesting point within the law of equality, as the natural law, is that the outcome will always reflect the starting point, and since we are walking our existence on an endless spring, we are, in every moment, living the consequences of the forces that were exerted upon us, and we as a result continue with the same line of force. What this means is that we don't really have to go back in time and actually know all the details of the forces that were in play for us to have reached this point, because the spring will keep repeating itself - it would thus be sufficient to investigate all that is here at this moment, within self honesty, in order to come to the conclusion of the "type" of forces that were in play, through investigating what exists within and as our reality we can conclude the "type" forces exerted over and over – were these forces aligned with the natural force, the law of balance that allows life to exist, or where they aligned with the forces of self interest as the forces that disregard life as all that is here.
 
We have been looking at the force as the starting point, as the source. I suggest investigating the possibility that the force exerted will be dependent of the property of the mass - I have defined the mass thus far as energy, information and memory - mass from this perspective is any form of substance, a substance can be an idea, a belief, a memory, knowledge, an energetic reaction, anything we hold onto as "emotional baggage" - while the property of the mass indicated who we are, as what we are equal to and one with through our participation - we can conclude that if we believe we are applying ourselves as mass into acceleration and do not have an impact or do not influence reality in the way we intended - we must revisit our starting point within investigating the property of ourselves as the mass, as our force is proven to be ineffective - at this point we can push harder and harder but without considering what it is that we are pushing, as the mass, as who we are, we might never resolve the problem and reach the desired solution. If the force that we are exerting is causing conflict and friction in our world and our reality, we must consider that the property of our mass, as who we are, is not aligned with the forces of nature, and thus we must change ourselves to become one with nature as all that is here, to correct our mass to have the properties of life, as the properties of equality, and within such properties we will be aligned with the forces of balance, as the force of nature, and will thus apply ourselves as acceleration into a direction that is best for all life.
 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”
Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction
Day 2 - Physics and the Desteni Process – Newton's First Law of Motion - the Principle of Inertia
 
In my previous blog I discussed Newton's first law of motion, also known as the principle of inertia, showing how all things resist change, within this we've seen that the property that determine how much resistance an object will have is their "inertial mass" as the mass of the object, within the Desteni Process of self change, the "inertial mass" that will resist our self change is energy, as in how much energy / attention we give to our mind components as patterns / thoughts / beliefs, how much we are emotionally invested in our self beliefs and self definitions, how much value we give an idea / opinion - where the more "inertial mass", the more energy a pattern has, the more resistance it will have towards change. Newton's first law of motions tells us that without a force acting upon an object, the object will simply continue as it was - the same goes for us, without any force "pushing" us to change - we will not change, we will remain in our comfort zone, where the more energy, as "inertial mass", we have invested in a point/pattern/thought/idea, the more uncomfortable it will feel to move out of it.
 
In this blog I will discuss the concept of force
 
In physics, a Force is any influence that causes an object to undergo a certain change, it is done within the context of interactions, whenever objects interact they exert forces upon each other, thus an interaction is a relationship between forces. Our reality works within relationships, everything that we can see, describe or experience is created through relationships, and each relationship is connected by the forces involved within the interaction.
 
For a moment I will skip over Newton's second law of motions and start with the third law because there is an interesting point within it that has been overlooked, I'll clear this point up now, and then in future blogs will be able to reference back to it if necessary.
 
Newton's third law is a law of interaction and equality, it is presented as such:

Where:
FAB = the force object A is exerting on object B
FBA = the force object B is exerting on object A
 
What this simple equation means is that within the interaction of any two object, the force exerted by object A upon object B, is equal and opposite in direction (hence the minus sign in the equation) to the force that object B is simultaneously exerting on object A. the law is described as follows:
 

What this means is, for example, when you are pushing against a wall, the wall is actually pushing you back in an equal force and in an opposite direction, and it makes sense because if there was nothing pushing you back, you would fall through the wall. When you are sitting on an uncomfortable chair, and feel like the chair is pushing you on a specific point, you are actually pushing that point against the chair.
 
We experience force being exerted upon us within a point of blame and self victimization, as if we are forced by the force, when actually, within looking at it self honestly, it really only shows us that we are exerting force onto it, this is a law that allows us to see our acceptances and participations, because, have a look, if I am in an uncomfortable position, where I am not enjoying the interaction, that would mean that I am participating and exerting force that is a key ingredient in the creation and stability of the uncomfortable situation as only through my participation within this equal and opposite force, can the other force which I blame, exist - thus my uncomfortablility from a perceptive of taking self responsibility is actually only due to my participation within the interaction, and not the responsibility of anything or anyone else in the equation.
 
What I find odd and unacceptable about the definition of this law is within the words "action" and "reaction", because it implies cause and effect, while in fact the two forces are being exerted simultaneously, thus it's only a matter of perception and interpretation to come to the conclusion that the one force is causing the activation of the other - the common accepted belief derived from the specific wording of Newton's third law definition is that the one is initially pushing the wall and only as a reaction the wall is pushing back - but in actuality it cannot be so, because it is happening simultaneously, there would be no physical and valid reason to assume that the one force is the "action" and the other is the "reaction" and not the other way around, yet the use of words within the definition indicates inequality, which is in complete contradiction to the basic equation, that actually implies equality. So, from my perspective, the greatness of this law has been overlooked and wrongly interpreted.
 
Despite this insight within FAB = - FBA which implies equality within each and every interaction, it has been agreed upon in the physics community that all calculations are done in respect to the forces acting on the body, and not in respect to the equal and opposite forces that the body is participating in - mathematically this wouldn't change a thing, it is merely a reflection of the point of view that the physics community is representing, as the scientific community is as well trapped in their own minds, not seeing the forces that are in play, not realizing the forces they are participating with and supporting, as the mind system, through their wrongly interpretations. It might seem like a random decision to some, but really it isn't random at all, it is very specific, because we can clearly see that it goes in alignment with the mind consciousness system, where as the mind we exist within blame, we believe things are happening to us, because we have never considered taking responsibility and realizing that we are the source of all our experiences, and here physics is another layer of justification as it has been aligned with the mind's perspective, as looking at an object and analyzing what is happening to it, while not considering looking at the same exact forces that the object is emitting back and thus is responsible for, equally.
 
So here, science, within the interpretation of physics, has given us the wrong example, as it has been agreed upon in the scientific community that the forces in discussion are the ones being emitted upon a body and not the forces the body is emitting and thus responsible for - this perspective reflects us as victims to circumstances, instead of realizing the self empowerment within taking responsibility for ourselves within realizing that we are participating and thus are the source of all our interactions, and within this realization learn/investigate ourselves, to recognize how/why we have allowed ourselves to be directed by forces, why we have accepted ourselves as less than them, and direct ourselves to change, within a starting point of equality to and as ourselves, to and as the force within us, to and as reality and the physical as a whole of which we are one with and equal to, and within doing so, take responsibility and direct our force to support ourselves as life and all life as one - all this has been hidden from us, through the "random" interpretation of Newton's third law of motion.
 
Unfortunately, the implications of this law, within the current understanding is one of abdicating self responsibility instead of realizing the self empowerment that exists within this law, within realizing that we are actively participating within every interaction and relationship, yet we believe ourselves to be less than, within the belief that things are being done to us, and are being forced upon us, not realizing that we are allowing every force that is being placed upon us through our acceptance and allowance within and as the interaction, as Newton's third law states for every force exerted onto us we are exerting an equal force, and thus are equal participants in the interaction. Which is actually great news because it means that we can takes self responsibility and direct ourselves within our participation, and thus direct our force to support ourselves as life, and not be directed by the force of the mind - This means we are powerful, we have always had the force within us, as us, within every interaction, but we have never before learnt how to use it, we have not realized ourselves as equal to it - we must realize that all that we need is to change our starting point of how we allow ourselves to exist as, from a starting point of inferiority within believing the things are being done to us, to a starting point of equality within realizing that all that is here is interacting through equal and mutual relationships, and thus we are responsible for our participation, and thus we can direct ourselves and our force within us in support of ourselves as life.
 
We must realize that within every interaction there is an acceptance of both participants in the interaction and thus both are equally responsible and are exerting equal force towards one another, thus, our ability to direct ourselves and the force within us, and thus the interactions we participate within, our ability to make a directive decision whether or not to participate in an interaction, or to direct it in awareness as a practical solution - are interesting points to consider - it can be seen nicely in Kong Fu (I've seen this in movies) where the Kong Fu master won't participate in the exchange of forces, he won't fight back, but rather "use the opponent's force against him" what he is actually doing is simply not participating in the exchange of forces the opponent was attempting to direct, but rather is directing the situation, one can say he is creating a new equation as a practical solution instead of participating within and enhancing the problem, he is directing a new result of the situation. From this perspective we must realize our responsibility of our interaction and forces around us and thus recognize our participation with our own forces, because in each interaction we can either be directed by the force as less than the force, as being forced to do something by a perceived external force, or we can change our starting point within it all and realize ourselves as equal to the force within us, that we have been participating in without being aware, and thus, within changing our starting point, change ourselves as a point of responsibility and support of life.
 
We are all directed by the forces exerted at us, the forces within us direct us as thoughts, feeling and motions that we follow blindly within existing as less than, we are directed by the system of the world as money as we are forced to work for our living, we are forced by our physical form and limited in our motions and abilities - many forces are exerted at us - through the support of Desteni Process, what we must do is to equalize ourselves to and as these forces, because, the third law of motions shows us that for each force exerted upon us, we are exerting an equal and opposite force, so we must now take responsibility for our force which we have been denying as ourselves, we must realize that we are in fact actively participating with everything in existence yet we are not the directive principle, as we are allowing ourselves to follow thoughts, feelings, emotions which are energy, that in itself is derived from the physical, thus we are allowing ourselves to exist as less than the thoughts which are directing us, less the emotions and feelings that are directing us, less than energy and less than the physical as a whole - as long as we exist as less, we are still participating but without directive principle, so we are forced by the force, we are thus not self responsible as we haven't taken on a point of responsibility as equals, we must empower ourselves and learn to direct the force within us that we are actually participating within already, and so use our force in support of life, and so take responsibility that all force will be directed as support of life
 
Once we realize this point, and within walking the desteni process, we start taking responsibility and our range of responsibility grows, we first take responsibility for ourselves within making sure that our participation is of support of ourselves as life, within the principle of do as you would like to receive, then we can start considering those around us within realizing that even though they are responsible for all the forces they participate in, they are yet to be aware of it, or in other cases, they are restricted to a situation where they have to participate in a specific way based on fear of survival due to the situation of this abusive system in which we exist within, because at the moment the system in which we exist within, which we created and continue creating through our participation, is driven by the forces of the mind, and as such is not aligned with supporting all as life, thus, as long as we exist in such a system the forces around us are many and the task to take responsibility is greater due to having more obstacles on the way, thus if we are in a position that allows us to hear this message, and to act on it, to take self responsibility, to direct ourselves within self honesty as what is best for all - if we have the ability to do so, then we have a responsibility to support others to do so as well.
 
Within this it's important for me to emphasize that this isn't in no way about blaming those that are in bad situations through justifying it within the principle that they are participating and responsible for everything in their experience, because consider that I have made this point very simplified as looking at the most simplistic case of interaction between two objects alone, when in fact all and every thing in this reality interact with everything simultaneously, thus in every moment you are interacting with every other particle in existence and thus are equally responsible for the condition of our existence and every being within it, because you are exerting force that allows the stability of this existence to exist and within it the stability of the current system that doesn’t support all life- so one must be self honest and not go into a point of isolation within the idea that everyone is responsible solely for themselves - no, we are all equally responsible for everything, but we start with self and then expand, so each of us, in time, and as process unfolds, will have to take responsibility for all those that are not yet in a position to take responsibility for themselves due to the system we exist within. We must realize that the system is the way it is due to each of our acceptance and our accumulated force put into holding it together, and thus we must direct our force to be in the best interest of all life.
 
To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

This blog is a part of a blog series “physics and the Desteni Process”

Day 1 - Physics and the Desteni Process - Introduction

The science of physics exists within the goal to investigate and describe the physical reality in it's totality. In the following series of blogs I will go through the basic and most known laws and principles of physics - I will explain them briefly and then will show that which hasn't been considered within the interpretation of these laws - I will be investigating physics within the starting point of equality and oneness, and will attempt to show the connections and realization that we can derive from it and use it as valid insight into the understanding and support of our human experience, within this I will show the alignment of the laws of physics to the Desteni Process - one must wonder why, through out our history, these simple connections, understandings and realizations have been overlooked by the scientific community and society as a whole.
 
Let's have a look at Newton's laws of motion, as you may know Newton, among other great discoveries, has discovered three basic and simplistic laws of motion.
 
In todays blog, I will start with Newton's first law of motion, also known as the principle of inertia - I will explain the law, then I will discuss the desteni process for context, and then will show the connection between the two.
 
Newton's First law of motion - the principle of inertia
This law is about change, or more accurately - the resistance to change. Newton had found that within each body/object there is an inner force called inertia. Inertia is defined as the ability of a body/object, to resist change in motion, to preserve it's present state of motion. Fascinatingly enough, the word inertia is derived from Latin word, iners, which actually means laziness, so one could say that inertia reflects the amount of laziness in an object - In other words the object wants to continue doing what it's been doing, if it was at rest it wants to continue resting, and if it was moving it wants to maintain it's velocity, it wants to move at the same speed and the same direction as it was.
 
This force of inertia is found within/as the mass of the body/object, so the mass of an object reflects the amount of resistance the body has to change it's velocity, whether speed or direction - one can say that any body/object has an inner "desire" to remain constant in it's velocity, the amount/size of this desire is quantified by the amount of mass an object has - this is referred to as inertial mass.
 
Derived from the principle of inertia, Newton's first law of motion states that without an external force, the object's inner force as inertia will allow it to maintain it's present state, and more specifically, if the sum of all the forces exerted upon an object cancel each other out, the object will stay in a state of inertia, in a constant velocity - this law goes in both directions of reason - if an object is moving in a constant velocity, thus, in a constant speed and in a straight line, that would mean that all the forces exerted on the body cancel each other out, and are equivalent to zero. To even further simplify, Newton's first law indicates : no force = no change.
 
Newton's first law of motion is described mathematically in the following equation:

Where: F - Force, v - velocity, t - time
It simply states, that if the sum of all forces is equivalent to zero, then there will be no change in velocity through time.
 
The Desteni Process
The desteni process is a process of self change within the principle of equality and oneness. Each one that has made the decision to start walking the Desteni Process is now in the process of exploring themselves through establishing self trust in self honesty within discovering who self really is in order to take self responsibility and become the directive principle of self, to live as self expression in support of all life in equality, within making a directive decision as who self chose to be and change self to become it.
 
The Desteni Process is a process one walk for oneself, as oneself, within the self realization that until now we have never known who we are because we have existed in separation of ourselves, and thus have never known how and why we do what we do, feel what we feel, think what we think - we have never known ourselves yet, we have accepted this bundle of reactions as who we are - we have accepted it as who we are even though we have never been the directive principle of our experience and reality - we have allowed ourselves to be directed by our mind, as we have allowed our thoughts, feelings, emotions, beliefs, ideas and all other mind components to dictate to us what we do / think / feel and basically define to ourselves who we are - but have we ever considered asking ourselves - if this really is who we are, why are we not directing ourselves, and if it isn't who we are than what the hell is directing us?
 
We have been existing in separation from ourselves, and within that have existed within inequality as we have not been equal to ourselves as our minds, we have allowed our mind to be the directive principle as we have been sitting in the passenger seat, being enslaved to it.
 
Within the Desteni Process one start looking and investigating oneself within self honesty - where self honesty is crucial because what we have believed ourselves to be, we will find, has all been a lie, as it is based on an idea, a self created personality, an illusion - and now, once we start seeing this, we start a process of self change - we change ourselves from who we have existed as within our acceptance of the mind being our directive principle, into actual living beings, we rebirth ourselves as beings that support ourselves as life and all life in equality, we rebirth ourselves into beings of self respect and self honor, and we do so within realizing that without the mind limiting and separating us we are all in fact one and equal.
 
How do the two connect and What we can learn about ourselves from Newton's first law of motion?
The desteni process is a process of self change and within walking it we will all experience the resistance to change, just as an object resists change - both objects and humans resist change - change isn't something that we willingly and easily want to do - we will all make up excuses and find justifications to remain as we are, to not have to change, we will manipulate ourselves through allowing ourselves to change within a small point while hiding from ourselves the big point that we are holding onto within self interest and will resist changing ourselves within it, a point we have invested ourselves emotionally into and have defined ourselves by.
 
Thus, the first point to understand is that change is difficult, there is an inherent resistance towards change within everything in reality as Newton's first law shows us, thus, we mustn't be hard on ourselves, we must realize that each point we will work on within this process has it's own "inertial mass" that will resist change, and we must then realize that some points will be more difficult to change than others depending on their "inertial mass" - but how do we equate "inertial mass" to our process? It obviously isn't about actual mass as body weight, so what is the equivalent to "inertial mass" within the human experience?
 
To my surprise, as I was looking and investigating this question I realized that the answer to this question exist within the physics equations as well, within one of the most famous equations: E=mc^2 . This equation (which I will not go into just yet) shows that energy and mass are interchangeable, and this is the answer to my question - as energy is the "inertial mass" within the human experience that resists our change.
 
What I mean by energy is any emotional reaction we hold towards anything in our reality / experience, the "emotional baggage" we have towards something whether its towards another human being, an even or a thought in our mind. Looking within self honesty, you will realize that we all experience this emotional energy on a daily basis.
 
The accumulation of emotional energy towards a point will make it "heavier" within us and thus more resistance to change - the more we think of a point, the more we entertain ourselves with it, we give it energy - you can look at a scenario of accumulating emotional energy, as anger, towards someone over a period of time, accumulating memories, ideas, beliefs, blame, justifications - all existing within an emotional energetic charge. Now, compare that to being angry at someone for something that happened in the moment - which would be easier to breathe through and direct, which will stay with you for longer, which will you continue energizing, making it bigger and bigger in your minds - yes, the one that had more "inertial mass", more emotional baggage, as energy - within this, there is an interesting point to realize, that the point / pattern / thought within us has an "inertial mass" to it as the emotional energy we have given it, yet, we have the power within us to give it more energy as we participate with in, or stop giving it energy, breathing through it, grounding it, investigating it and not allowing it to direct us.
 
The process of change will happen within walking through the resistance of change, but we now know what gives the resistance it's power, what is the quantity of "inertial mass" within it, and thus we can direct ourselves within awareness to stop feeding it energy, as we have discovered that emotional energy is the force of resistance to change.
 
Another point to consider, is that we must realize that whenever we think about something we are giving it energy, and thus creating more "inertial mass" for the specific thought/point and for the mind in general - this is what the law of attraction is based on - give more energy to your positive thoughts and make them more powerful, more forceful than your negative ones and you will live a positive life with positive manifestation - what they have not considered is that all energy within the mind is basically the same, judging anything being positive or negative is just an outcome of our programing within the society we exist in, the experiences we had, and the interpretations we gave it- in the bottom line, the mind in it's totality resists change, it resists the self change we are walking towards, thus all the mind wants is to fuel itself up with energy, to become "heavier", to have more "inertial mass" - thus, it is within the interest of the mind for you to participate and feed the positive energy within you, but what you are actually doing is creating more "inertial mass" for the mind, and thus making it harder for you to change as self expression, and to free yourself from the enslavement of the mind.
 
Because have a look, a "positive thinker" is still bound to their mind, and thus, exist as an organic robot, a slave, not a living expression of themselves as life, not living in this reality within equality and oneness to all that is here, but is isolating themselves in their mind - so the experience might be a good one, and the good experience is used as justification to continue feeding the positive thoughts with more positive energy - this is why the mind prefers positive people, because just like within the economic system, those that have a positive economic experience, justify it, and will not allow themselves to see the abuse that is allowed within humanity through the very system that is providing for them their wealth - so the mind wants you to be happy so you don't threaten it, so you don't change and free yourself from it's enslavement.
 
This is a crucial point and I will further expand on it, but as of now it's important to realize that feeding the mind with either positive or negative energy is the same thing, both polarities feed the mind with emotional energy, and make it stronger, heavier, and thus make it harder for ourselves to walk the process of self change - as practical application you can investigate this for yourself, stop participation within the energy of the mind, stop the thoughts that come up, don't fuel them with emotional energy, support yourself as life through stopping your participation with thoughts, beliefs, judgments, ideas, emotions, reactions and allow yourself to get out of the energy of the mind and back to the physical reality within breath.

To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life

I was always interested in physics, I thought that through physics I will find the truth about reality at the most basic level of how everything works, as it is a science that is dedicated to understand nature within the entity of the universe, to discover the behavior of matter and energy, I thought it's goal was to find a simple set of equations that will describe our reality in it's totality. I was wrong.
 
I decided to study physics as my major in the university and was immediately disappointed at the fact that there is not emphases on philosophy, on the deep questions of the universe, it seemed like all the studies were dedicated to understand how objects, in our reality, behave, but there was no intention to actually understand everything within the totality of our existence which would include humanity as part of existence and thus a valid part of the physics research. There was no consideration to the fact that humanity is in fact a part of the research field that is being studied, there was no attempt to connect the human experience to the science of physics and thus there was no intention to derive any conclusions from physics to the benefit of humanity within taking the human experience as the mind into consideration. I remember thinking to myself that as long as human behavior and consciousness is not taken into consideration in this magnificent science, we will never find the ultimate equations, as what has been described as the "theory of everything"as the attempt to find a theory that would unify or explain through a single model the theories of all fundamental interactions and of all particles of nature, a model that will answer all questions - which is what I thought physics was about - though I now realize that most major scientists have lost hope and are willing to compromise within the belief that such a model does not exist or cannot be revealed.
 
I've extracted some quotes from professor Stephen Hawking's lecture "Godel and the End of the Universe" - these specific quotes are aligned with my approach to physics, showing that we could have interpreted the science of physics differently and could have thus come to different conclusions if we had focused our attention and research on these points that will be presented in the quotes below - for those of you who want to read the entire article, it can be found here, and for those of you who are not interested, I have highlighted the main sentence I am referring to within the quote.
 
The following two quotes are here as an examples that the connection between physics and consciousness as human behavior has been made from several aspects in physics:
 
In relation to quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle:
“One can therefore claim that there is still determinism but it is determinism on a reduced level. Instead of being able accurately to predict two quantities, position and velocity, one can predict only a single quantity, the wave function. We have re-defined determinism to be just half of what Laplace thought it was. Some people have tried to connect the unpredictability of the other half with consciousness.”
 
In relation to Maxwell's equations of light and the relativistic wave equation:
“… So in principle, we ought to be able to predict human behavior...”
 
What I came to realize is that through out the history of physics the connections between the field of physics to the field of consciousness as human behavior were always evident, as presented in the quotes above, but these attempts have been brushed aside and ignored as the main stream scientific community is far from perusing this venue. In my three years of studying physics, not once has consciousness or any aspect of the connection between physics and the human behavior/experience, been brought up for discussion.
 
Stephen Hawking in his lecture shares that the main motivation of physicists: "the real reason we are seeking a complete theory, is that we want to understand the universe and feel we are not just the victims of dark and mysterious forces…
He then continues to describe another theorem and shares, what I find to be a contradiction within the very essence of the physics field as he declares that: But we are not angels, who view the universe from the outside. Instead, we and our models are both part of the universe we are describing. Thus a physical theory is self referencing... The theories we have so far are both inconsistent and incomplete.
 
I can't help but detect a form of deception presented within his words, as there seems to be a contradiction, or better yet a gap between the declaration and the practicality - what I see within this is that we as physicists, as scientists, have declared that we want to understand the universe while being well aware of the obvious fact that we are a part of it. Yet, we will not consider investigating ourselves, as humanity, as part of the research within the physics discipline. Further more, we will not consider using the valuable findings, from even the most basics physics research, in order to expand our understanding of humanity through extracting the knowledge from the insight of the physics research, within the starting point of actually incorporating it into the investigation of human behavior in order to effect, influence and improve the human experience within the physical existence which we are a part of.
 
I realize now that studying physics in the university is not about understanding the universe, or getting insight into human behavior through real physical scientific research, or even about developing critical scientific thinking - it's mostly about learning and understanding the existent knowledge from the starting point which it already exists within, as if to support the accepted limitations that the science of physics exists within - even if a student will continue to a higher degree of research, the goal would then be to try and find some small aspect of an already existing theory to explore further. It seems to me that the scientific community is not inclined to find new theories or perspectives that will include human nature, behavior and the human experience in the equations of the universe, they have left that to the study of Psychology and other human studies, which I find ridicules, because - our reality is one, it is not actually divided into academic disciplines, and thus it should be our goal to unite all disciplines in order to really understand our reality .
 
Something I've learnt through walking my masters degree in education, is that all academic and scientific research is directed by the research question, and then the result is subject to the interpretation of the scientist. What this means is that if you change the question you will get a different answer, and if you change the starting point from which you interpret the results you will come to different conclusions.
 
I will show, in the blogs to come, that all the findings that have been discovered in the history of physics, can be looked at through a different starting point, a starting point of supporting humanity within our human experience and our relationship to ourselves and the reality in which we exist in, I will show that if we look at the physics findings through the lens of equality, as is suggested by the Desteni Process, they will point as well in the direction of equality, showing that equality is the principle in which reality exists by, and thus, is the solution and answer we have been searching for - it has always been here and has always been overlooked - to do so I will discuss several physical equations and principles and will relate them to the Desteni Process, through interpreting them slightly differently, and thus deriving different conclusions, within this showing that if only we would change the lens through which we view our reality, as changing our starting point, we would see that the “theory of everything” is already here, as the principle of equality and oneness as what is best for all.

To learn more about yourself and how reality functions, please consider a FREE online Course
Desteni I Process Lite - Learn Practical Life Skills Online
Also, Please check out the following Links:
Desteni
Desteni Wiki
Desteni Forum
Desteni I Process
Equal Money System
Journey to Life Group
Eqafe Life Products - Self Help
Creation's Journey to Life
Heaven's Journey to LIfe
Earth's Journey to Life